Investigating the roles of self-compassion and trauma types on post-trauma outcomes among Veterans

Abstract:Military service carries a high risk of trauma exposure, contributing to significant psychological distress, including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Identifying protective factors that mitigate distress and promote resilience is crucial for supporting Veterans’ well-being. This study examined the relationships between self-compassion, trauma type, and post-trauma outcomes—specifically, PTSS and posttraumatic growth (PTG). It was hypothesized that higher self-compassion would predict lower PTSS and higher PTG and that trauma type would impact these relationships. A total of 155 Veterans participated in the survey; however, due to incomplete responses, only 116 surveys were included in the final analysis. The measures used were the Life Events Checklist (LEC-5), PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5), Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), and the Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF). Exploratory correlation analyses indicated that greater self-compassion was significantly associated with lower PTSS and higher PTG ( p < .05). Trauma type was not significantly associated with PTG but was linked to PTSS, with non-interpersonal trauma being associated with higher PTSS ( p < .05). Regression analyses revealed that self-compassion accounted for 20% of the unique variability in PTSS and 20% in PTG, while trauma type predicted 3% of the variability in PTSS but was not a significant predictor of PTG. The findings provided strong support for the hypothesis that self-compassion predicts both PTSS and PTG, whereas trauma type showed a weak association with PTSS and minimal influence on PTG. Contrary to expectations, non-interpersonal trauma was linked to higher PTSS compared to interpersonal trauma. These results highlight self-compassion as a key protective factor in post-trauma adaptation, suggesting its potential role in interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in Veterans. Future research should explore the mechanisms underlying these relationships and evaluate the efficacy of self-compassion-based interventions in military populations.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.