Military to civilian retirement transition: Moderated mediation model of dispositional factors, transition difficulty, and well-being

Abstract: This study investigated how prior career experiences imprint on individuals' behaviors, particularly in military contexts, shaping their transition into civilian life upon retirement. Resistance to change, one's tendency to resist or avoid making changes, and personal sense of power, one's perception of their ability to influence people and resources, often become by-products of military institutionalization, influencing military-to-civilian retirement transition and well-being. A moderated mediation model was proposed wherein personal sense of power would moderate the indirect relationship between resistance to change and well-being, mediated by transition difficulty. The sample was comprised of retired Indian Army personnel (N = 256). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the scales culturally, and Hayes' PROCESS Macro was used to test moderated mediation. Findings reveal that resistance to change and transition difficulty negatively affect well-being. Moreover, transition difficulty partially mediates the relationship between resistance to change and well-being. Notably, personal sense of power moderates this mediation, acting as a buffer. The study underscores the significance of organization-relevant dispositional factors in comprehending the challenges of military retirement and their implications for overall well-being. The study provides recommendations for addressing dispositions such as resistance to change and personal sense of power through interventions like preretirement counseling, scenario-based exercises, growth mindset training, and confidence-building workshops to help veterans navigate transitions more effectively.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.