Longitudinal evaluation examining implementation and sustainment of an opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution among Veterans who are unstably housed

Abstract: Background: Rigorous implementation evaluations are needed to understand factors that influence implementation and sustainability of evidence-based interventions across contexts. In this study, we conducted a longitudinal, multi-methods, multi-site evaluation guided by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework (DSF). This evaluation focused on implementation of the Homeless Overdose Prevention-Expansion (HOPE), an opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) trial in a permanent supportive housing program in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We used a multi-methods study design comprised of qualitative interviews and completion of a three-item survey. Semi-structured interviews were completed with Department of Housing and Urban Development-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) staff, site leaders, and site prescribers at four VA healthcare systems in the Western United States. Interviews were conducted at three timepoints: pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainment. Site staff also completed the Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS) during sustainment to provide more context for our interpretation of results. We analyzed interview data using rapid directed content analysis guided by DSF constructs and analyzed PRESS using descriptive statistics. Results: We conducted 96 interviews with 67 unique individuals. Six determinants influenced the reciprocal fit of the intervention, practice setting, and ecological system across our study: (1) OEND for unstably housed veterans; (2) Staffing shortages and competing demands; (3) Training-related concerns; (4) Supervisor and leadership buy-in at site; (5) Social workers' scope of practice; and (6) Cultural climate and saliency of OEND initiatives. Both planned and unplanned implementation strategies were optimized by different actors (i.e., the implementation team, target practitioners) in response to evolving determinants at all three DSF levels to maintain overall fit. Approaches taken to optimize fit depended on longitudinal data collection and evaluation of determinants at each phase. Conclusions: Our approach is a theoretically driven example of capturing important determinants of implementation and sustainment of OEND in a high-risk setting. Despite the uniqueness of our study setting, our approach is generalizable and has the potential to promote sustainability of other public health interventions.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Defence and Veteran mental health and wellbeing strategy 2025 – 2030

    Abstract: People are the most important Australian Defence capability. The resilience, dedication and professionalism of the Defence and veteran community underpin our national security. We want Australians to be attracted to serving our nation in our Australian Defence Force, and confident that they and their families will be respected and well supported by their leaders, their mates and the broader Defence organisation. In addition, they should be safe in the knowledge that whatever may befall them during their service, they will be properly looked after, and their service acknowledged, respected and commemorated by a grateful nation. As such, it is our nation’s duty to empower and support their mental health and wellbeing. This means providing for our people and their families to serve well, live well and age well, no matter where they are on their Defence and veteran journey. This strategy adopts a preventive and holistic approach. In addition to early intervention and comprehensive care, it prioritises wellbeing from the day they sign up, until well after they’ve hung up their uniform for the last time. By embracing a life course approach, we honour the service and acknowledge the sacrifices made by the Defence and veteran community This strategy unites the Department of Defence and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs in their resolve to foster a culture of proactive wellbeing and mental health care. It leverages combined expertise and resources to ensure our Defence and veteran community receive the support they need during and after service. This strategy is complemented by action plans that describe the initiatives, programs and services that will achieve our goals and outcomes. This strategy will fortify Australia’s Defence capability by building a positive culture, with leadership that empowers self-agency and supports the wellbeing of Defence’s integrated workforce. Our approach will help Defence achieve the outcomes of the National Defence Strategy 2024 while improving recruitment and retention of personnel in the Australian Defence Force. We acknowledge the work of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. The insights and reports of the Royal Commission, as well as other reports including the Productivity Commission’s: A Better Way to Support Veterans inform our wellbeing and suicide prevention initiatives, programs and services. This includes the co-design of a new agency focused on veteran wellbeing. I am proud to share with you the first joint Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy. It provides a shared vision, goals and outcomes for meaningful change to empower every member of our Defence and veteran community to lead healthy and fulfilling lives. The journey ahead requires concentrated effort and unwavering dedication in order to build a more resilient and healthier Defence and veteran community. I sincerely thank all those who have provided input. You have helped shape the vision, goals, outcomes and priorities in this strategy in an effort to improve the mental health and wellbeing outcomes for those in the Defence and veteran community.

    Mental Health Well-Being