Evaluating the feasibility of an experimental paradigm for alcohol-involved sexual violence perpetration among active duty and Veteran men

Abstract: Background: Sexual assault is common in the military and heavy episodic drinking (HED) is a strong predictor of sexual violence perpetration. Objectives: The current study examined factors associated with engaging in alcohol-involved sexual violence perpetration (ASVP) in an experiment to extend ASVP research to military populations and against men. Method: We recruited 9 dyads (N = 18 men; active duty n = 12, veteran n = 6) over the age of 21 who reported HED together at least twice in the past month. Procedures were completed via video teleconference. Dyads completed a survey followed by a validated experiment assessing ASVP. Each participant had the opportunity to show either a sexual or neutral clip to an ostensibly intoxicated confederate in the military (gender randomly assigned at dyadic level) who reported a strong dislike of sexual content. Participants discussed their choices prior to making their decision. Discussions were transcribed and coded for verbalizations that supported (‘go cues’) or discouraged (‘stop cues’) their peer from engaging in ASVP during the experiment. Results: Results found that individuals with a perpetration history were less likely to engage in verbalizations of discouragement of peer ASVP (ß = −.563, p = .030), while participants were more likely to engage in verbalizations of discouragement of peer ASVP when the ostensibly intoxicated victim was a man (ß = .671, p = .025). Conclusions: This study laid the groundwork as a first step in understanding ASVP behaviour in a lab setting with military populations. Future research using fully powered samples can examine the role of peer influences on ASVP to harness for military sexual assault prevention.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.