Evaluation of the low-demand model for serving unsheltered homeless Veterans in transitional housing

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracts with community-based agencies to operate its Grant and Per Diem (GPD) transitional housing programs, including a low-barrier model called low demand. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of unsheltered veterans served by the GPD Low Demand program with those of unsheltered veterans served by two other GPD programs (Clinical Treatment and Service Intensive). METHODS: National VA administrative data on 16,059 unique unsheltered veterans who participated in GPD programs in fiscal years 2019-2023 were analyzed. Outcomes examined included rates of positive program exit, returns to homelessness within 12 months, and use of VA health care services before and after program admission. RESULTS: The Low Demand program served a higher proportion of unsheltered veterans than the two comparison programs (36.8% vs. 24.0%-26.8%, respectively). Nearly half (46.4%) of unsheltered veterans in the Low Demand program had positive program exits, but they were significantly less likely to have positive program exits and exits to permanent housing, had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have reduced acute care use than unsheltered veterans in the two comparison programs. Veterans who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, and had a moderate VA service-connected disability rating were more likely to have a positive exit from the Low Demand program. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reflect challenges experienced in low-barrier programs serving unsheltered individuals, who often have high treatment needs. Unsheltered individuals with certain profiles may benefit more than others from low-barrier programs.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Outcomes from a posttraumatic growth-oriented program among Veterans: A quasi-experimental retrospective study

    Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.