Bridging justice and treatment: Evaluation of a Veteran’s treatment court program

Abstract: Compared to the civilian population, veterans are at an increased risk of developing substance use and other mental health concerns. These disorders can create an elevated risk of encountering the criminal justice system. Veteran treatment courts are specialized courts that are intended to meet the specific needs of veteran offenders and can result in lesser charges or expungement. The present study used a mixed methods approach to evaluate a veteran treatment court in the southeastern region of the United States by following a cohort of 19 participants as they progressed through the program. Participants were asked about their depression, perceived procedural justice, and open-ended questions concerning their perceptions of the program. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t tests, and open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, depression scores declined across the study. There were no changes in perceived procedural justice from the beginning to the end of the study, suggesting that participants perceived both the judge and veteran treatment court supervisor positively. Upon examination of the open-ended responses, participants reported appreciation for the staff, a desire for increased staff, and increased treatment individuation. The present study hopes to provide a framework for future researchers aiming to explore the impact of these types of programs.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.