Navigating transition: A mixed methods study protocol for understanding chronic pain, resilience, and well-being among Canadian Armed Forces Veterans, families, and service providers

Abstract: Introduction: Transitioning from military to civilian life is often challenging for Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Veterans, and chronic pain further complicates reintegration and wellbeing. Family members and service providers play critical but understudied roles in this process. Methods: This mixed-methods study combines secondary analysis of the previous dataset with new qualitative interviews. Quantitative analyses will describe characteristics of Veterans with chronic pain and assess associations between pain severity and transition outcomes using regression models. Qualitative interviews with Veterans (n=10), family members (n=10), and service providers (n=10) will explore pain management, barriers and facilitators to care, and resilience strategies, analyzed using both deductive (framework-guided) and inductive thematic approaches. Results: Findings will identify correlates of chronic pain and transition outcomes, as well as systemic gaps and resilience-enabling supports across the transition continuum. Discussion: This study is the first in Canada to examine chronic pain in Veterans’ transition through a multi-system lens inclusive of family and provider perspectives. Grounded in resilience frameworks, the design addresses individual, relational, and structural influences on post-service adjustment. Anticipated findings will inform targeted interventions, caregiver supports, and provider education to strengthen resilience and improve care coordination for Veterans with chronic pain.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.