More than a score: Evaluating military Veterans' success when applying to medical school

Abstract: Due to the inherent nature of service in both military and medical careers, some veterans are drawn to medicine after completing military service. However, there are significant financial and academic barriers for veterans applying into medical fields. Average grade point average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score are two heavily weighted metrics in the medical school application process. Veterans often have less rigorous academic backgrounds and more limited preparation for the MCAT in comparison to traditional medical school applicants. As a result, veterans may be less competitive than traditional applicants through direct comparisons of GPAs and MCAT scor s. The authors' analysis focuses on whether this limitation affected veterans' success in applying to medical school. Using aggregated data from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), the authors analyzed the average GPAs and MCAT scores of applicants with any military experience (defined as "military applicants") compared to the pool of all applicants from 2018 to 2024. During this period, military applicants to U.S. MD programs had an average GPA that was 0.16 points lower and average MCAT score 3.4 points below the average of all applicants. Despite lower academic metrics, the military applicant acceptance rate to MD programs was 41.7% compared to 40.7% for all applicants. Veterans should not be deterred from seeking a path of service in medicine by below average GPAs or MCAT scores. Medical school admissions over the past 6 years show that medical school admission committees value the perspective, life experience, and skills military veterans bring to medicine despite their lower GPAs and MCAT scores.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.