Profiling "noncombat" musculoskeletal injuries in special operations forces: A systematic review

Abstract: Background: Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel are at a high risk of musculoskeletal (MSK) injury. The aims of this systematic review were to a) profile MSK injuries sustained by SOF personnel and b) identify evidence-based injury prevention strategies. Methods: Registered with the Open Science Framework, the protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of the 3,773 studies identified, 14 met the eligibility criteria, with 6 additional studies identified following screening of the reference lists of the included studies. Extracted data were summated in five naturally occurring MSK injury themes: 1) incidence in SOF populations; 2) anatomical location; 3) nature; 4) mechanism; and 5) risk factors. Results: Injury incidence ranged from 8 to 846 injuries per 1,000 personnel per year with the lower extremities as the most reported site of injury. The leading nature of MSK injuries were strains and sprains, while the most common mechanism of injury was physical training. Smoking, physical performance, movement limitations, muscular asymmetries, and imbalances were reported as factors that can increase MSK injury risk. Conclusion: This review informs injury prevention strategies within SOF populations, notably, reducing run mileage and alternating running with weight load walking, educating Operators on proper lifting technique, and analyzing force plate testing data to guide program design and implementation.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.