Preparing mental health support for multi-domain, large-scale combat operations: Current progress and future directions

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Projected limitations during multi-domain and large-scale combat operations suggest that mental health support from specialized personnel (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers) may not be readily available, necessitating management of mental health conditions by nonspecialized personnel in far-forward environments for extended periods of time. Because of these limitations, updated models for combat and operational stress control are needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the direction of the Joint Staff Surgeon, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, and other senior leaders in the DoD, several initiatives have been undertaken to expand the capability of medics, general medical practitioners, unit commanders, and front-line service members to enable the delivery of supportive mental health care in the absence of specialized medical personnel. RESULTS: Taken together, these recent innovations fit into a comprehensive model for organizing non-specialty mental health resources around the point of injury in a large-scale combat environment, identifying gaps in current capabilities and highlighting potential interventions to address these gaps. In particular, an emphasis on self-aid through resilience training, specific peer-based interventions, in-depth training for medics, and greater command involvement may sufficiently overcome projected limitations in future combat scenarios. DISCUSSION: Full implementation of this model at scale to address capability gaps will require a concerted effort by stakeholders throughout the Military Services and Combatant Commands. Requirements must be put in place to ensure that training in these interventional models is included in initial entry training and Tactical Combat Casualty Care. CONCLUSIONS: An adapted model of combat and operational stress control for large-scale combat operations has the potential to overcome limitations in the future battlespace that may limit the interventions that have been employed for the past several decades.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Unveiling binge drinking trends and triggers among army personnel: A cross sectional study

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Military populations are known to have higher prevalence and heavier alcohol use compared to the general population globally. This has serious negative implications to the military. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, patterns and associated factors of binge drinking among male military personnel in the Sri Lanka Army. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted among 1337 male Army personnel in active service using multistage sampling. A self-administered questionnaire and the interviewer-administered Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test which is a 10-item screening tool were used. Prevalence of binge drinking was summarised as a proportion with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Age specific prevalence rates and the age standardized prevalence rate of binge drinking were calculated. The standard measure of one unit of alcohol being equivalent to 10 g of pure alcohol was used as a reference to calculate the units of alcohol consumption. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with binge drinking. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of binge drinking was 51.2% (95% CI 48.5%-54.0%). The age standardized prevalence of binge drinking was 28.3%. The majority binge drank once a month (50.4%). Those engaged in binge drinking used 5.6 median units of alcohol on a typical day, 84% consumed arrack, 69.3% have ever thought or attempted to quit and median age of first alcohol consumption was 18 years. When controlled for confounding, those who had mental distress (AOR 2.46, 95% CI=1.72-3.53), had sex with a commercial sex worker (AOR 1.92, 95% CI=1.21-3.06), ever smoking (AOR 1.69, 95% CI=1.27-2.25), had serious consequences (AOR 1.58, 95% CI=1.13-2.20), currently used cannabis (AOR 1.39, 95% CI=1.02-1.89) and had combat exposure (AOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.87) had a higher likelihood of binge drinking. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of binge drinking warrants immediate advocacy to the highest level of command of the Sri Lanka Army for support to implement sustainable evidence-based alcohol prevention programmes.