Bridging justice and treatment: Evaluation of a Veteran’s treatment court program

Abstract: Compared to the civilian population, veterans are at an increased risk of developing substance use and other mental health concerns. These disorders can create an elevated risk of encountering the criminal justice system. Veteran treatment courts are specialized courts that are intended to meet the specific needs of veteran offenders and can result in lesser charges or expungement. The present study used a mixed methods approach to evaluate a veteran treatment court in the southeastern region of the United States by following a cohort of 19 participants as they progressed through the program. Participants were asked about their depression, perceived procedural justice, and open-ended questions concerning their perceptions of the program. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t tests, and open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, depression scores declined across the study. There were no changes in perceived procedural justice from the beginning to the end of the study, suggesting that participants perceived both the judge and veteran treatment court supervisor positively. Upon examination of the open-ended responses, participants reported appreciation for the staff, a desire for increased staff, and increased treatment individuation. The present study hopes to provide a framework for future researchers aiming to explore the impact of these types of programs.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Reintegration and decent work among United States Veterans: Impact of marginalization, social support, and career adaptability

    Abstract:United States military veterans face challenges when reintegrating into civilian society. Among these difficulties often exist barriers for veterans in navigating work and career experiences. This study tested factors that may contribute to experiences of decent work and reintegration in a sample of 90 United States veterans. Utilizing the Psychology of Working Theory as a framework, veterans' social support was hypothesized to be a moderating factor in the relationship between veterans' experiences of marginalization and decent work. Additionally, decent work was examined as a potential mediator in the association between veterans' career adaptability and reintegration. Separate moderation and mediation models were tested to examine the study's hypotheses. Results did not find social support to moderate the relationship between marginalization and decent work. However, decent work significantly and partially mediated the relationship between career adaptability and reintegration. Interpretation of these findings in the context of the literature is discussed, as well as implications for practice and theory, limitations, and future directions.