A framework for setting special and incentive pays in the Department of the Air Force: Motivation, development, and analysis to support the framework

Abstract: Special and incentive (S&I) pays, including bonuses, are a key element of military compensation that vary because of such factors as occupation, assignment, duty type, and location. The Department of the Air Force (DAF) requested that RAND Project AIR FORCE develop a strategic compensation framework for S&I pays. The framework's purpose is to ensure that these pays achieve their intended purposes and that the DAF uses them in a coordinated, comprehensive manner while recognizing their interrelationship with other pays and aligning them with the U.S. Air Force's (USAF's) and U.S. Space Force's (USSF's) talent-management goals. The authors reviewed existing statutes, policy documents, and literature related to military compensation; convened a panel of experts to identify strategic objectives, key features, and necessary data and models for the framework; and held, discussions with subject-matter experts (SMEs) involved with setting S&I pays from the DAF, USAF, USSF, and Office of the Secretary of Defense. The authors demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by applying it to one of the DAF's widely used incentive pays: selective retention bonuses. Because the framework highlights the importance of estimating how changes to S&I pays affect desired outcomes, the authors also developed models to estimate the effects of the Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP), which is a pay designed to encourage members to volunteer for difficult-to-fill or less desirable assignments, locations, or units.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Unveiling binge drinking trends and triggers among army personnel: A cross sectional study

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Military populations are known to have higher prevalence and heavier alcohol use compared to the general population globally. This has serious negative implications to the military. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, patterns and associated factors of binge drinking among male military personnel in the Sri Lanka Army. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted among 1337 male Army personnel in active service using multistage sampling. A self-administered questionnaire and the interviewer-administered Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test which is a 10-item screening tool were used. Prevalence of binge drinking was summarised as a proportion with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Age specific prevalence rates and the age standardized prevalence rate of binge drinking were calculated. The standard measure of one unit of alcohol being equivalent to 10 g of pure alcohol was used as a reference to calculate the units of alcohol consumption. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with binge drinking. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of binge drinking was 51.2% (95% CI 48.5%-54.0%). The age standardized prevalence of binge drinking was 28.3%. The majority binge drank once a month (50.4%). Those engaged in binge drinking used 5.6 median units of alcohol on a typical day, 84% consumed arrack, 69.3% have ever thought or attempted to quit and median age of first alcohol consumption was 18 years. When controlled for confounding, those who had mental distress (AOR 2.46, 95% CI=1.72-3.53), had sex with a commercial sex worker (AOR 1.92, 95% CI=1.21-3.06), ever smoking (AOR 1.69, 95% CI=1.27-2.25), had serious consequences (AOR 1.58, 95% CI=1.13-2.20), currently used cannabis (AOR 1.39, 95% CI=1.02-1.89) and had combat exposure (AOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.87) had a higher likelihood of binge drinking. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of binge drinking warrants immediate advocacy to the highest level of command of the Sri Lanka Army for support to implement sustainable evidence-based alcohol prevention programmes.