A qualitative descriptive study on toxic leadership in military settings

Abstract:In the early 2000s, the study of toxic leadership gained significant attention, especially in military settings. However, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the experiences of leaders and subordinates with different ranks, specialties, years of service, and genders working in a military context where toxic leadership was perceived as the predominant leadership style. This qualitative descriptive study explores toxic leadership in military settings using a broad literature review, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis. It captures the perception and experience of active-duty military personnel who have encountered toxic leadership. The study highlights the importance of recognizing toxic leadership and aims to raise awareness about the perceived effects of this toxicity on the well-being and performance of subordinates. This study uses the toxic triangle model of leadership ostracism and the leader’s member exchange theory. This study calls for a positive change in the organizations impacted by leader toxicity. By delving into participants’ experiences, the common patterns, themes, and variations in the perceived negative influence of toxic leadership on subordinates and the underlying factors contributing to toxicity are explored. The results provide valuable insights into personnel's subjective experiences, well-being, and performance outcomes. This calls for organizations to adopt healthier leadership practices and develop a culture promoting subordinates’ well-being and high performance. The findings also reflect recommendations of the military personnel to develop policies, training, and individual coping mechanisms that enhance personnel effectiveness and mental health.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Reintegration and decent work among United States Veterans: Impact of marginalization, social support, and career adaptability

    Abstract:United States military veterans face challenges when reintegrating into civilian society. Among these difficulties often exist barriers for veterans in navigating work and career experiences. This study tested factors that may contribute to experiences of decent work and reintegration in a sample of 90 United States veterans. Utilizing the Psychology of Working Theory as a framework, veterans' social support was hypothesized to be a moderating factor in the relationship between veterans' experiences of marginalization and decent work. Additionally, decent work was examined as a potential mediator in the association between veterans' career adaptability and reintegration. Separate moderation and mediation models were tested to examine the study's hypotheses. Results did not find social support to moderate the relationship between marginalization and decent work. However, decent work significantly and partially mediated the relationship between career adaptability and reintegration. Interpretation of these findings in the context of the literature is discussed, as well as implications for practice and theory, limitations, and future directions.