Navigating public stigma: How empathy, mental health knowledge, familiarity, and gender influence attitudes toward Veterans with PTSD and TBI

Abstract:This study sought to examine the levels of public stigma toward veterans with combat-related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CR-PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) among undergraduate college students. It was hypothesized that empathy, TBI knowledge, familiarity with TBI and veterans, and gender would be associated with less stigmatizing attitudes. Stigma-related attitudes amongst participants were measured across anger, fear, avoidance, danger, and desire to help after reading vignettes describing a veteran with CR-PTSD only and a veteran with CR-PTSD and mild TBI. Contrary to expectations, results indicated that there was no significant difference in levels of public stigma between veterans with CR-PTSD alone and those with both CR-PTSD and TBI. Greater empathy and TBI knowledge was associated with lower levels of public stigma, partially supporting the second hypothesis. However, familiarity with TBI and veterans did not reduce stigma, contrary to previous findings. Gender differences were observed, with women expressing more empathy and desire to help, while men reported higher levels of anger. These findings emphasize the need for public education on TBI and PTSD to increase empathy and reduce public stigma toward veterans. Limitations of this study include a homogenous sample, vignettes featuring only mild TBI symptoms and male characters, and the use of online self-report measures. Future research should investigate these relationships in more diverse populations and with more severe TBI descriptions.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.